Soapstone Analysis:
Speaker: Frank Bruni, a writer for the NY Times since 2011. He has been both a White House correspondent and the chief restaurant critic. He reflects on diverse topics such as: American politics, higher education, violence in football, gay rights and his own life as a gay man in a close-knit family.
Occasion: Frank Bruni, in his article, " Hillary Clinton's Democratic Debate Magic", he explains how Hillary dominated this debate between her and Bernie Sanders until they brought up her past. Hillary dominated this debate until Bernie Sanders explained how the issue to be focused on should e those emails by Hillary.
Audience: The intended audience is the democratic citizens. The two in this debate was Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, two democratic who's running for president.
Purpose: Frank informs his audience how how Hillary dominates the debate for the most part, until Bernie brings up the issues with Hillary and her emails.
Subject: The subject was about Hillary Clinton. Clinton dominated the debate for the Democratic side.
Tone: This article's shows a informative tone for this section in the article. He informs his viewers on the astonishing debate that occurred on Oct 13, 2015.
Speaker: Frank Bruni, a writer for the NY Times since 2011. He has been both a White House correspondent and the chief restaurant critic. He reflects on diverse topics such as: American politics, higher education, violence in football, gay rights and his own life as a gay man in a close-knit family.
Occasion: Frank Bruni, in his article, " Hillary Clinton's Democratic Debate Magic", he explains how Hillary dominated this debate between her and Bernie Sanders until they brought up her past. Hillary dominated this debate until Bernie Sanders explained how the issue to be focused on should e those emails by Hillary.
Audience: The intended audience is the democratic citizens. The two in this debate was Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, two democratic who's running for president.
Purpose: Frank informs his audience how how Hillary dominates the debate for the most part, until Bernie brings up the issues with Hillary and her emails.
Subject: The subject was about Hillary Clinton. Clinton dominated the debate for the Democratic side.
Tone: This article's shows a informative tone for this section in the article. He informs his viewers on the astonishing debate that occurred on Oct 13, 2015.
Rhetorical Analysis of two rhetorical strategies :
1. Antithesis, he makes a connection between Hillary and how she made these lines up.
“I’m a progressive, but I’m a progressive who likes to get things done,” she said strongly but not stridently. “I know how to find common ground and I know how to stand my ground.” It was a practiced line — so practiced that she used it, somewhat awkwardly, a second time an hour later. But it was also a well-crafted line.
2. Enumeratio, he makes the point about how Hillary exclaimed to audiences bow she was progressive.
The debate’s moderator, Anderson Cooper, noted that she’d told some audiences that she was a progressive but extolled her moderation in front of others. Wasn’t she just a chameleon, flashing whatever colors suited her at a given moment?
1. Antithesis, he makes a connection between Hillary and how she made these lines up.
“I’m a progressive, but I’m a progressive who likes to get things done,” she said strongly but not stridently. “I know how to find common ground and I know how to stand my ground.” It was a practiced line — so practiced that she used it, somewhat awkwardly, a second time an hour later. But it was also a well-crafted line.
2. Enumeratio, he makes the point about how Hillary exclaimed to audiences bow she was progressive.
The debate’s moderator, Anderson Cooper, noted that she’d told some audiences that she was a progressive but extolled her moderation in front of others. Wasn’t she just a chameleon, flashing whatever colors suited her at a given moment?