Soapstone Analysis:
Speaker: Frank Bruni, a writer for the NY Times since 2011. He has been both a White House correspondent and the chief restaurant critic. He reflects on diverse topics such as: American politics, higher education, violence in football, gay rights and his own life as a gay man in a close-knit family.
Occasion: Frank Bruni wrote his article, "Ben Carson and Donald Trump Lack Electricity In A Charged Debate", talks about the debate between Carson and Trump and how they" The two men in the lead got lost in the pack." He explains how both candidates shouldn't be in the debate.
Audience: The intended audience is the citizens. This is a debate right? Both sides debated on economic crisis in the United States and how they would change this issues. They both exclaim their sides in this debate to show the Audience that their the right fit for president. But as a result, they both failed.
Purpose: Frank informs his audience on how the two people that's in the top run for president is horrible. They both didn't really win the debate in Frank's eyes. According to his article, he exclaims " For the first hour of the debate, which was staged by CNBC, Trump largely disappeared. His rivals and the moderators demonstrated less interest in him than they had in the past, and a Trump without attention is like a petunia without water and light. It fades. It droops. And while that presented a window of opportunity for Carson, he lacked the pep to get through a window or, for that matter, an extremely wide set of sliding doors. His eyelids sometimes went to half-mast as he swayed through an answer, making a sluggish voyage to an uncertain destination." He explained how as the debate started, Trump was going down hill and that it was Carson's time to shine, but he didnt take that opportunity.
Subject: The subject of this article is about our two top runners for president: Donald Trump and Ben Carson. Bruni explains how the both Trump and Carson responded to questions throughout the entire debate and the things that should've done better.
Tone: This article's shows an disapproving tone between Carson and Trump. Bruni quotes throughout the entire article to explain how the debate went and how people felt about the candidates responses to the debates.
Speaker: Frank Bruni, a writer for the NY Times since 2011. He has been both a White House correspondent and the chief restaurant critic. He reflects on diverse topics such as: American politics, higher education, violence in football, gay rights and his own life as a gay man in a close-knit family.
Occasion: Frank Bruni wrote his article, "Ben Carson and Donald Trump Lack Electricity In A Charged Debate", talks about the debate between Carson and Trump and how they" The two men in the lead got lost in the pack." He explains how both candidates shouldn't be in the debate.
Audience: The intended audience is the citizens. This is a debate right? Both sides debated on economic crisis in the United States and how they would change this issues. They both exclaim their sides in this debate to show the Audience that their the right fit for president. But as a result, they both failed.
Purpose: Frank informs his audience on how the two people that's in the top run for president is horrible. They both didn't really win the debate in Frank's eyes. According to his article, he exclaims " For the first hour of the debate, which was staged by CNBC, Trump largely disappeared. His rivals and the moderators demonstrated less interest in him than they had in the past, and a Trump without attention is like a petunia without water and light. It fades. It droops. And while that presented a window of opportunity for Carson, he lacked the pep to get through a window or, for that matter, an extremely wide set of sliding doors. His eyelids sometimes went to half-mast as he swayed through an answer, making a sluggish voyage to an uncertain destination." He explained how as the debate started, Trump was going down hill and that it was Carson's time to shine, but he didnt take that opportunity.
Subject: The subject of this article is about our two top runners for president: Donald Trump and Ben Carson. Bruni explains how the both Trump and Carson responded to questions throughout the entire debate and the things that should've done better.
Tone: This article's shows an disapproving tone between Carson and Trump. Bruni quotes throughout the entire article to explain how the debate went and how people felt about the candidates responses to the debates.
Analysis of Tone:
This article's shows a disapproving tone between Carson and Trump. Bruni quotes throughout the entire article to explain how the debate went and how people felt about the candidates responses to the debates. " He explain how this debate went by showing how disapproving it is to have two top candidates for the presidents election respond to the questions the way they did when the others asked the questions.
This article's shows a disapproving tone between Carson and Trump. Bruni quotes throughout the entire article to explain how the debate went and how people felt about the candidates responses to the debates. " He explain how this debate went by showing how disapproving it is to have two top candidates for the presidents election respond to the questions the way they did when the others asked the questions.